Awriter wants to satirize a current politician in a work of fiction. which technique would be most effective for the writer to develop the humor? setting up a clearly defined target of the humor focusing on the fundamental limits to human ability using strong language in the narrative correct/ exaggerating the politician’s characteristics

The correct answer is correct/exaggerating the politician's characteristics because exaggeration is one of the literary tools to make a statement worse or better in order to generate humor in the narrative. In this case, the writer's purpose is to satirize a current politician. It's not the option one because it's important to set up a defined target, but in this case, the main idea is to satirize the politician not to focus on the target of the humor. It's not the option two because it is very wide to focus on the fundamental limits to human ability, the writer wants to talk about a specific individual not about the limits of humans in general. It could be the option three but it's not correct for this case as use strong language don't necessarily mean to emphasize characteristics of an individual, the writer could use strong language, not for humor but for state, a point of view that could be funny or not and the final purpose is to develop humor.

D:correct/ exaggerating the politician’s characteristics

Explanation:

which of the following was specifically permitted by the emancipation proclamation?

free african americans were allowed to fight for the confederacy.

free african americans were allowed to enlist in the union army and navy.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to move to the north.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to become confederate citizens. nrg myjr i64gq3y45h5t5

lol

today at the bank, an old lady asked me to check her balance. so i pushed her over.