Write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas.

Found this on past answered questions...seems legit lol.

Personally, I think that using controlled fires to protect wild areas is a bad idea. First of all, I don't think there is a thing as a raging, huge CONTROLLED fire. Just one slip up something could go wrong. I don't think it's worth it. There are other ways to protect wild areas, and burning it down is not one of them. Secondly, it releases a lot of carbon dioxide. That is not good for the atmosphere. We want breathable air, not smoke and carbon dioxide. Lastly, you could kill a lot of wildlife. Burning down the area to save the area will not help. I do not think it is worth it.

the answer should be d) he was one of those young thousands who greeted the war with a certain amount of relief, welcoming the liberation from webs of tangled emotion" since it is the best option because it shows his desire to free himself. 

hope this answer you! have a great day.