What is implied in the last line of this excerpt from mark twain's "the £1,000,000 bank-note"? as i approached the house my excitement began to abate, for all was quiet there, which made me feel pretty sure the blunder was not discovered yet. i rang. the same servant appeared. i asked for those gentlemen. "they are gone." this in the lofty, cold way of that fellow's tribe. a. that the servant hails from a different country and most likely migrated to england for employment b. that the servants in the homes of wealthy londoners consider themselves to be better than everyone else c. that the servant is unhappy with his employers and treats all his guests in a rude fashion d. that most servants in london have to live in poor conditions and frequently suffer from cold e. that the servants in london are prohibited from being friendly with their master's guests

What we see implied in the last line of this excerpt from Mark Twain's "The £1,000,000 Bank-Note" is what we find in letter B. that the servants in the homes of wealthy Londoners consider themselves to be better than everyone else.

The word choice here can be "translated": "The same servant appeared. I asked for those gentlemen. 'They are gone.' This in the  lofty, cold way of that fellow's  tribe= "The same servant appeared. I asked for those gentlemen. 'They are gone.' This in the arrogant, cold way of that fellow's class (or category).

The author means that the people from that man's class (servants in the homes of wealthy Londoners) all have a feature in common: they are haughty and aloof.

Answer is option B. For plato users

Explanation:

I just took the test.

how much wood did the woodchuck chuck since a wood chuck can chuck wood.

xd

btw woodchucks cant chuck wood.

brainliest ?

the correct answer is option d. none of these. it is noted that options a, b, and c share the same content.

despite the valid answer provided at the last sentence of each of the options, a question/answer format shouldn't include humourous themed responses such as "you bet your thermal pj's we do." - unless of course, the answer is carried out in an informal environment. this could be replaced with a simple "yes" or "it is necessary".

the question should be re-phrased to a more appropiate syntaxis. instead of "do we need the greenhouse effect? ", it should be written as "is the greenhouse effect necessary? " in order to give it a general scope, instead of limiting the answer to the needs of "we" the humans.