Why would an author use an unreliable narrator?

Because unreliable narrators are telling a story that isn’t quite, accurate or credible. Do to their mental state/maturity.

Answer and Explanation: An unreliable narrator could be used by the writer to create a text with different levels of truth. By using an unreliable narrator the writer might give the readers the possibility to use their own interpretation of the events to reveal what is reliable and what is not.

the answer is b, it brings the reader closer to the action.

it would've been a if the word had been determined, not conceited

hope this

-ironwolfx

the passage can be best described as: "the british legislature extended an unwarranted jurisdiction".

we can say that because the text clearly states how the people of the colonies warned the british about their excessive desire to rule over them, without taking into consideration the difficulties their brothers had experienced in america: they struggled to establish the colonies, to adapt to new types of weather, fight with the natives, etc., and how they now see (or then saw) the only way out was to cut all ties with the british, since they ignored the people's petitions.