Since madison argues the constitution would protect the rights of the minority, is he justified in believing that “a coalition of a majority of the whole society could seldom take place on any other principles than those of justice and the general good”?

madison is justified in believing that a coalition of a majority of the whole society could seldom take the place on any other principle than those of justice and the general good, this protects the rights of the minority by making sure no law can be made that do not benefit the majority;

i think descriptive but i'm not 100% sure.. sorry.