Explain why politicians might resort to personal attacks in their campaign advertisements. how might using this type of argument benefit them?

In politics, personal attacks became a really useful resource during their campaign advertisements. This resource is mostly use to drop their competitors credibility and perception people have of them, by putting in the spotlight any bad decision or mistake made by them in any certain point, with the intention to show they are not prepared to fulfill the position.

Even though this is unprofessional, people often seem to fall into this game, due to the politician's power of convincing.

the illustration   that would give a reader a clear understanding of the text is a picture of men constructing the frame of a building.the frame is made of iron bars. the text describes the job of blacksmiths'. these were very organised and they had different names: "the driver" and "the heater". the text describes the way in which these men worked ; they worked iron pieces as if they were playing a sport. in fact, the text wants to show the men's skills. the text also puts some emphasis on the use of '' rivets'' in construction. this kind of nails were not always used in the construction of manhattan.

some examples:

"and with an underhand toss he hurled the smoking rivet straight at the catcher, who caught it in mid-air in his catching can." men's skills

"when the driver was ready for a new " the emphasis on the rivet ( special nail used in construction).

" it against a beam to remove any cinders, and jammed it into the waiting hole. " the emphasis on the rivet.

i could of w this question but i don't see a " passage " .

~

sorry ! ):