Any comment gets brainliest in your own words, evaluate the objectivity of each article. where can you see the authors’ personal biases? where can you see an objective delivery of facts? what is the central message of each article? * * * theyou can see that something is biased by the way it is written. if a writing is biased the author will use words to make you feel a certain way, they will put their own personal feelings or opinion in subtle ways in hope that the reader will agree with them. unbiased writing would not have adjectives that are subjective, only plain fact. proof of bias in t he first article is through the use of these phrases: "masterful skills" "terrible sportsmanship" this is bias because it is not simply stating what happened, the other is building a tone by saying things like "terrible". it might not have been terrible to everyone, so that makes it biased. proof of bias the second article is: "unfortunately" "unsportsmanlike activity" "overzealous" "egregious penalties" "disappointing."

you can see that something is biased by the way it is written. If a writing is biased the author will use words to make you feel a certain way, they will put their own personal feelings or opinion in subtle ways in hope that the reader will agree with them. Unbiased writing would not have adjectives that are subjective, only plain fact. Proof of bias in t he first article is through the use of these phrases: "masterful skills" "terrible sportsmanship" this is bias because it is not simply stating what happened, the other is building a tone by saying things like "terrible". It might not have been terrible to everyone, so that makes it biased. Proof of bias the second article is: "Unfortunately" "unsportsmanlike activity" "overzealous" "egregious penalties" "disappointing."

you can see that something is biased by the way it is written. If a writing is biased the author will use words to make you feel a certain way, they will put their own personal feelings or opinion in subtle ways in hope that the reader will agree with them. Unbiased writing would not have adjectives that are subjective, only plain fact. Proof of bias in t he first article is through the use of these phrases: "masterful skills" "terrible sportsmanship" this is bias because it is not simply stating what happened, the other is building a tone by saying things like "terrible". It might not have been terrible to everyone, so that makes it biased. Proof of bias the second article is: "Unfortunately" "unsportsmanlike activity" "overzealous" "egregious penalties" "disappointing."

Explanation:

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)