Write an argument against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas

Our forests are 'kept in check' by using controlled fires. When our wild areas can be destroyed. Native plants and animals are pushed out of their homes to not go back for years. Certain aspects of the forest can take up to sixty-five years to regenerate. While this may not seem long to the universe, this can be a life time for us. Yes our forests need fire, but they can do it themselves. Before people came along our wilderness was keeping itself in control for millions of years. But now humans step in and believe that they need to take over everything. We are already cutting down forests for trees and unnecessary housing. So why do we need to get rid of it more? Fires can handle themselves. Forests know what they are doing. But do we?

mrs. wright was trapped in her marriage, and could not escape it

in other words

to put it differently

for one thing

as an illustration

in this case

for this reason

to put it another way

that is to say

with attention to

by all means

important to realize

another key point

first thing to remember

most compelling evidence

must be remembered

point often overlooked

to point out

on the positive side

on the negative side

with this in mind

notably

including

like

to be sure

namely

chiefly

truly

indeed

certainly

surely

markedly

such as

especially

explicitly

specifically

expressly

surprisingly

frequently

significantly

particularly

in fact

in general

in particular

in detail

for example

for instance

to demonstrate

to emphasize

to repeat

to clarify

to explain

to enumerate