94 pts someone write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas. has to be 500 words .

Here it is:

Personally, I think that using controlled fires to protect wild areas is a bad idea. First of all, I don't think there is a thing as a raging, huge CONTROLLED fire. Just one slip up something could go wrong. I don't think it's worth it. There are other ways to protect wild areas, and burning it down is not one of them. Secondly, it releases a lot of carbon dioxide. That is not good for the atmosphere. We want breathable air, not smoke and carbon dioxide. Lastly, you could kill a lot of wildlife. Burning down the area to save the area will not help. I do not think it is worth it.

Best of luck,

same test same problem

no it is not a sin or wrong to be gay. you can be whoever you want just dont hurt anybody or kill anybody. god gave us freewill so we could do whatever we want and be whoever they want to be. all those other people who think gay is bad they are wrong, they can love whoever they want longs they don't hurt or kill each other.

being gay is not a sin or wrong. if you are gay then you have our support and love. cause lets face it, love is love and no bully will ever stop us from being who we are. we are human and we can be different. being different is what makes us humans.

its okay to be gay everyone.

hope this : )

have a great day