subject
English, 17.07.2019 02:30 jolleyrancher78

Need urgently read this paragraph from the article: together with the united nations, the u. s. government, and partners around the world, the global alliance for clean cookstoves focuses on working with local communities and organizations to develop a market for cookstoves and fuels that significantly reduce emissions, cook more efficiently, and fit with local customs and culture. . why does the author use the word significantly rather than mostly? significantly has a more negative connotation, indicating that the reduction in emissions may be less than expected. significantly has a weaker connotation, indicating the prediction is for only a moderate reduction in emissions. significantly has a stronger connotation, indicating that the predicted reduction in emissions will make a notable difference. significantly has a more positive connotation, indicating that the author has total confidence in the plan's success.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 02:20
What do critics say about art happenings and flash mobs
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
In just over one hundred years, between 1701 and 1810, 252,500 enslaved africans were brought to barbados—an island that occupies only 166 square miles (making it, today, one of the smallest countries in the world). the english then set out to conquer more sugar islands, starting with jamaica, which they took from spain in 1655. in the same period that the 252,500 africans were brought to barbados, 662,400 africans were taken to jamaica. thus, sugar drove more than 900,000 people into slavery, across the atlantic, to barbados and jamaica—and these were just two of the sugar islands. the english were eagerly filling antigua, nevis, saint kitts, and montserrat with slaves and sugar mills. they took over much of dutch guiana for the same reason. seeing the fortunes being made in sugar, the french started their own scramble to turn the half of the island of hispaniola that they controlled (which is now haiti), as well as martinique, guadeloupe, and french guiana (along the south american coast near dutch guiana), into their own sugar colonies, which were filled with hundreds of thousands more african slaves. by 1753, british ships were taking average of 34,250 slaves from africa every year, and by 1768, that number had reached 53,100. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how do the authors use historical evidence to support their claim? x(a) they use secondary sources to show how french and english monarchs were indifferent to enslaved people. x(b)they use secondary sources to show that enslaved people often fought for their freedom after arriving in the caribbean. the answer is: (c)they use facts from primary sources to show how countries increased the number of enslaved people to produce more sugar. x(d)they use primary source interviews to show that countries could make more money in trading sugar without using enslaved people.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:20
The majestic castle, surrounded by green foliage, stood proudly with turrets pointing skyward. which image best shows a visualization of this sentence?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:00
Why is broadway known as the great white way kown as great white way?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Need urgently read this paragraph from the article: together with the united nations, the u. s. g...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.04.2020 06:41
question
Mathematics, 24.04.2020 06:41