Which best identifies a subplot in julius caesar and explains its significance? question 20 options: brutus and cassius argue over bribes; it explains why brutus is unwilling to trust cassius, and why he insists upon marching to philippi. brutus and portia argue over the best way to kill caesar; it shows that the roles for women in roman society were quite limited. cassius argues with brutus over the best military strategy; it demonstrates why cassius would be a better leader than brutus. antony states that brutus was rome's most noble man; it shows that antony is a man of ambition who is no more fit to rule than cassius or caesar.

The choices are:

Brutus and Cassius argue over bribes; it explains why Brutus is unwilling to trust Cassius, and why he insists upon marching to Philippi.

Brutus and Portia argue over the best way to kill Caesar; it shows that the roles for women in Roman society were quite limited.

Cassius argues with Brutus over the best military strategy; it demonstrates why Cassius would be a better leader than Brutus.

Antony states that Brutus was Rome's most noble man; it shows that Antony is a man of ambition who is no more fit to rule than Cassius or Caesar.

I think the answer is Brutus and Cassius argue over bribes; it explains why Brutus is unwilling to trust Cassius, and why he insists upon marching to Philippi.

in 1636, roger williams settled at the tip of narragansett bay after being banished from the massachusetts bay colony for his religious views, on land granted to him by the narragansett tribe. he called the site "providence plantation" and declared it a place of religious freedom.

explanation: