subject
Engineering, 04.07.2020 21:01 pettitchristy1

It is often the case that the analysis of the "real" costs for a public project indicates the "real" costs will significantly exceed the "real" benefits, even though many of the "costs" and "benefits" involved in the analysis cannot be quantified. At the same time the financial analysis of quantifiable dollar benefits indicates the dollar benefits will significantly exceed the dollar costs. Even so, practicing professionals are not obligated to recommend to the public that the project go forward solely on the basis of the quantifiable dollar benefits ignoring non-quantifiable costs and benefits. A. TrueB. False

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Engineering

question
Engineering, 04.07.2019 18:10
The mass flow rate of the fluid remains constant in all steady flow process. a)- true b)- false
Answers: 1
question
Engineering, 04.07.2019 18:10
Determine whether or not it is possible to compress air adiabatically from k to 140 kpa and 400 k. what is the entropy change during this process?
Answers: 3
question
Engineering, 04.07.2019 18:10
Items are similar to the free issue items, but their access is limited. (clo5) a)-bin stock items free issue b)-bin stock controlled issue c)-critical or insurance spares d)-rebuildable spares e)-consumables
Answers: 1
question
Engineering, 04.07.2019 19:10
Air inially occupying a volume of 1 m2 at 100 kpa, 27 c undergoes three internally reversible processes in series. process 1-2 compression to 500 kpa during which pv constant process 2-3 adiabatic expanslon to 100 kpa process 3-1: constant-pressure expansion to 100 kpa (a) calculate the change of entropy for each of the three processes. (b) calculate the heat and work involved in each process. (c) is this cycle a power cycle or refrigeration cycle?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
It is often the case that the analysis of the "real" costs for a public project indicates the "real"...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 08.09.2021 06:10