Write a naive implementation (i. e. non-vectorized) of matrix multiplication, and then write an efficient implementation that utilizes Numpy's vectorization. When writing the function ensure that the matrix dimensions are correct (print the message Wrong dimensions! otherwise).

import numpy as np  

import time  

def matrixMul(m1,m2):      

   if m1.shape[1] == m2.shape[0]:  

       t1 = time.time()

       r1 = np.zeros((m1.shape[0],m2.shape[1]))

       for i in range(m1.shape[0]):

           for j in range(m2.shape[1]):

               r1[i,j] = (m1[i]*m2.transpose()[j]).sum()

       t2 = time.time()

       print("Native implementation: ",r1)

       print("Time: ",t2-t1)

       t1 = time.time()

       r2 = m1.dot(m2)

       t2 = time.time()

       print("\nEfficient implementation: ",r2)

       print("Time: ",t2-t1)

   else:

       print("Wrong dimensions!")

Explanation:

We define a function (matrixMul) that receive two arrays representing the two matrices to be multiplied, then we verify is the dimensions are appropriated for matrix multiplication if so we proceed with the native implementation consisting of two for-loops and prints the result of the operation and the execution time, then we proceed with the efficient implementation using .dot method then we return the result with the operation time. As you can see from the image the execution time is appreciable just for large matrices, in such a case the execution time of the efficient implementation can be 1000 times faster than the native implementation.

answer:

d. attempt to find the owner, then leave your information if you cannot find them.

explanation:

d. represents both (b) and (c).

more logical as well.

b and c are to complicated.

glad i could , give me a follow, so if you need with any other question, im here.

answer:

a

explanation: