Many advocates for GENE editing/CRISPR make the argument that it is useful in preventing diseases in humans/animals that are "genetic/DNA-related", but
where is the line drawn? If I am a parent that wants to make my unborn baby
6"4 or increase my child's life expectancy and I make the argument that it's for
my child's safety as the bigger my child is, the less inclined they will be
challenged to physical fights as they grow older - should this be allowed?
What if someone decided to make human-animal hybrids (it is possible) in the
name of "to make humans more resistant to certain illnesses"? Should this be
allowed? What if you hate the idea gene-editing and would like to BAN it
altogether - what would you do about vaccines? Many vaccines in the real-
world (today) modify one's RNA which store genetical information (extremely
similar to DNA) - where do you draw the line?