We saw that a copy constructor in a class X is normally declared with its parameter's type as const X&. We also saw that a compiler will not be willing to compile a copy constructor whose first parameter is instead declared with the type X. Suppose that the compiler was willing to compile it instead and that it worked according to the usual rules of C++. What would you expect to be the effect of writing a copy constructor this way and then calling it?

Write a computer program to calculate the three-phase fault current for a fault at f in figure 1.16, with the network normal, and with one line at a time removedproblems 1.1 write a computer program to calculate the three-phase fault current for a fault at f in figure 1.16, with the network normal, and with one line at a time removed 20 power system relaying from service. the positive-sequence impedance data are given in the accompanying table. use the commonly made assumption that all prefault resistance values are (1.0+j0.0) pu, and neglect all resistance values. calculate the contribution to the fault flowing through the cb b and the voltage at that bus. for each calculated case, consider the two possibilities: cb b2 closed or open. the latter is known as the stub-end fault í• figure 1.16 problem 1.1 system data for figure 1.16 from to positive sequence 0.0+j0.1 0.05j0.15 0.04 j0.2 0.01 jo.i 0.015 + j0.15 0.01 j0.19 0.01 +j0.19 0.03+j0.1 0.0+j0.08 6 6 6 from service. the positive-sequence impedance data are given in the accompanying table. use the commonly made assumption that all prefault resistance values are (1.0 + j 0.0) pu, and neglect all resistance values. calculate the contribution to the fault flowing through the cb b1, and the voltage at that bus. for each calculated case, consider the two possibilities: cb b2 closed or open. the latter is known as the “stub-end” fault.

When creating a presentation in libre office impress, where does the editing of slides take place?

How do you know if the website is secure if you make a purchase