subject
Chemistry, 09.12.2021 21:00 Angel1107

Which statement explains whether or not a person should use an experiment of a ball rolling down a hill as evidence that the force of gravity pulls objects straight down? A. They should not use it. The experiment has several dimensions of motion, including one parallel to the ground, so the motion of the ball does not directly test the force of gravity. B, They should not use it. The experiment has several dimensions of motion, including one parallel to the ground, so the motion of the ball does not directly test the force of gravity. C. They should not use it. Gravity should be tested in space, and this experiment could only be tested on Earth. D. They should not use it. Gravity should be tested in space, and this experiment could only be tested on Earth. They should use it. The experiment shows the ball falls toward the bottom of the hill, so it provides direct evidence that gravity pulls an object downward. E. They should use it. The experiment shows the ball falls toward the bottom of the hill, so it provides direct evidence that gravity pulls an object downward. F. They should use it. Any experiment on Earth involving natural motion will provide direct evidence that gravity pulls objects straight down.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Chemistry

question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 04:00
Asolution contains 225 g of sodium chloride, nacl, dissolved in enough water to make a 0.25 l of solution. what is the molarity of the solution?
Answers: 2
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 08:40
Which statement can best be concluded from the ideal gas law?
Answers: 2
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 13:00
Is 9 correct? and can someone me with 10? it’s due tomorrow, you
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 17:30
Which scenario is most similar to the type of collision that gas particles have according to kinetic molecular theory
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which statement explains whether or not a person should use an experiment of a ball rolling down a h...
Questions