Three students are working with different substances to measure the chemical changes that occur. chao is working with milk, mia is working with carbon dioxide gas, and ezra is working with rock. which would best describe the way to treat each substance to get a faster reaction? chao should change the temperature, mia should adjust the pressure, and ezra should increase the surface area. chao should change the concentration, mia should adjust the temperature, and ezra should increase the surface area. chao should change the temperature, mia should adjust the concentration, and ezra should decrease the surface area. chao should change the concentration, mia should adjust the pressure, and ezra should decrease the surface area.

The answer is: Chao should change the temperature, Mia should adjust the pressure, and Ezra should increase the surface area.

Milk is a liquid, carbon dioxide is a gas and rock is a solid.

The increase in energy will cause the reactants particles to move faster, which will increase their temperature and lead to a faster reaction rate.

The reaction rate is the speed at which reactants are converted into products.

The collision theory states that a certain fraction of the collisions (successful collisions) cause significant chemical change.  

The successful collisions must have enough energy (activation energy).  

If the surface area and temperature are increased, speed of reaction also increased.

Particles are in constant, random motion and possess kinetic energy, molecules faster and have more collisions.  

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

particle   p is an electron and particle q is a neutron