A scientist claimed that he radiocarbon dated a fossilized skull of a dinosaur and found it to be about 63 million years old. Do you support his claim? Provide at least one scientifically based reason why you do or do not support the claim.

Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning - and more than some could tolerate.  After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings.  Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors.  When the authors inquired, they received this letter:

Explanation:

i do not own my copyrights

it's all four options.

the answers are

c and c