Can triangles ΔAJB and ΔCBJ be proven congruent by SAS? Question 17 options:

A)

Yes, because ≅ , ≅ , and ≅

B)

No, because only two pairs of congruent sides are known.

C)

Yes, because ≅ , ≅ , and their included angles ∠CBJ and ∠AJB are congruent because they're alternate interior angles.

D)

No, the triangles ΔAJB and ΔCBJ are congruent only through SSS.

Green is technically every other color but green but the other wavelengths of the other colors get absorbed by the object and the wavelength of the color green gets reflected

Answerthis solution will not form a precipitateexplanationsolubility equilbrium:         pbf₂(s)  ⇄ pb²⁺(aq) + 2 f⁻(aq)the solubility product expression is    (we exclude solids from the equilibrium expression).now suppose we have the trial ion product q, which we can define as    then, we can interpret  q as the product of the concentration of the ions that we have and ksp as the product of the ion concentrations that are needed to form a saturated solution.if q > ksp, then that implies that there will be a surplus of ions that exceed the amount that is required to form a saturated solution. a precipitate will then form (the precipitate continually  forms until the surplus ions are removed and q is decreased to ksp's value).if q = ksp, the saturated solution that forms is barely saturated and the precipitate will be minimal.if q < ksp, then the ion concentration will not be enough to form a saturated solution (so no precipitate).using our information, we calculate the trial ion product:     since q = 2.7  × 10⁻⁸ < ksp =  4  ×  10⁻⁸, a precipitate will not form.

I’m not sure about this question

It's potassium i believe