subject
Chemistry, 29.10.2020 21:30 Iyana678

A scientist designed and conducted an experiment to test a hypothesis, and then formed a conclusion from her results. Next, she collected and analyzed more data and formed another conclusion. Which statement best justifies the fact that she skipped the hypothesis and experimental design steps of the scientific method? O The scientist must have realized that she performed one of the steps incorrectly.

O The scientist was unhappy with the first data set and started the experiment over.

O The scientist was repeating the experiment to improve the validity of her data.

O The scientist was planning to form a hypothesis after completing the experiment.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Chemistry

question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 01:30
100 points answer quick the table compares the number of electrons in two unknown neutral atoms. comparison of electrons atom number of electrons a 10 d 11 use this information to determine the number of valence electrons in the atoms. which of the following correctly compares the stability of the two atoms? both are unreactive. both are highly reactive. a is unreactive and d is reactive. a is reactive and d is unreactive.
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 03:30
How many neutrons does a atom of cobalt have?
Answers: 2
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 09:50
When balancing a chemical equation:
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 13:00
Adepositional also feature that forms where a stream enters a lake or an ocean is a
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A scientist designed and conducted an experiment to test a hypothesis, and then formed a conclusion...
Questions
question
Physics, 13.10.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 13.10.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 13.10.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 13.10.2020 14:01