For which of the following reactions is S° > 0. Choose all that apply. NH4I(s) NH3(g) + HI(g) CH4(g) + H2O(g) CO(g) + 3H2(g) 2NH3(g) + 3N2O(g) 4N2(g) + 3H2O(g) 2NH3(g) + 2O2(g) N2O(g) + 3H2O(l) CO(g) + Cl2(g) COCl2(g)

Explanation:

Entropy is the measure of randomness or disorder of a system. If a system moves from  an ordered arrangement to a disordered arrangement, the entropy is said to decrease and vice versa.

1. : As in this reaction 1 moles of solid reactants are converting to 2 moles of gaseous products. The randomness will increase and hence entropy will also increase. Thus > 0.

2. : As in this reaction 2 moles of gaseous reactants are converting to 4 moles of gaseous products. The randomness will increase and hence entropy will also increase. Thus > 0.

3.  : As in this reaction 5 moles of gaseous reactants are converting to 7 moles of gaseous products. The randomness will increase and hence entropy will also increase. Thus > 0.

4. : As in this reaction 4 moles of gaseous reactants are converting to 4 moles of gaseous products. The randomness will increase and hence entropy will also increase. Thus > 0.

5. : As in this reaction 2 moles of gaseous reactants are converting to 1 mole of gaseous products. The randomness will decrease and hence entropy will also increase. Thus < 0.

1. the question asks the most appropriate, which seems to rule out "all of the above." your choice appears to be the correct one.

2. the protocol described is good for identifying correlation, but not cause and effect. for cause/effect, you need to devise a protocol that will assign the treatment (or not) to groups that have essentially the same "demographics" with respect to all the other variables. your choice regarding control group seems appropriate. random assignment of treatment (choice d) may be appropriate also. (i think you can argue that b and d are just different descriptions of the same method.)

3. d will randomize the birds, but may not guarantee there are 10 in each group. e will do both, so seems the better choice.

comment on question 2

based on the problem statement, it seems clear that confident, attentive drivers are more likely to use daytime running lights. so, the protocol might need to be devised in such a way that the lights would be turned on or off without the driver's knowledge. (an attentive driver will figure it out.) assigning a confident, attentive driver to a group required to drive without running lights might mess with his/her confidence and attentiveness. you don't want your experiment to do that. (nor do you want the experiment to subject a driver to greater risk of accident as a consequence of driving without running lights.) experiments involving human safety are always problematic.

for step 7 table c on the lab "newtons law of action"   the average time it took the car to travel .25 meters   was 1.92 seconds.

the average time it took the car to travel 0.50 meters was 2.61 seconds

hope this : )