What is learned if the data from an experiment do not support the hypothesis

A hypothesis is seldom right, and ideas rarely become laws, but in many other words, scientifically established facts.

So, even if a hypothesis isn't validated, the experiment's scientists discover a new way of thinking about the assumption or new means to attain the hypothesis.

Even if a theory isn't proven, scientists consider it a win-win situation.

So, Option "C" is the correct answer to the following question.

link

Your answer should be C.

Explanation:

The reason is that, a hypothesis is very rarely correct, and in science, theories seldom become laws, or in other words, proven facts in science. So even when a hypothesis is not supported, the scientists in the experiment learn a new way to think about the hypothesis, or of other ways to achieve the hypothesis. When a hypothesis is not supported, scientists see it as a win win situation anyway.

Hopefully this helped!

lol for the pointsss