Schrodinger and heisenberg developed an alternate theory about atomic nature that contradicted some of bohr's model of the atom. how do changes resulting from new technology and evidence affect the reputation of the atomic theory?

They don't affect the reputation of atomic theory at all.

Explanation:

Schrödinger and Heisenberg extended the model of the atom, as did Thompson, Rutherford, and Moseley before them.

Each model was based on the best available information at the time.

The availability of new information may require a new atomic model, but it doesn't destroy the reputation of older ones.

out of these options:

ability to burn paper

pure sodium reacting violently with water

the boiling point of water

helium does not tend to react with anything

i would say this is a physical property:

helium does not tend to react with anything

why? :

i said helium does not tend to react with anything because well, it reacts to ! but ability to burn paper, pure sodium reacting violently with water, & the boiling point of water are chemical or

physical properties: the properties of a substance that can be observed without changing the chemical makeup of the substance

chemical properties: properties of a substance relating to the chemical nature and reactivity of the substance

shield volcanos are angry and get mad over the smallest things so much that there heads erupt   pahoehoe and a'a lava. a composite volcano is the poller opposite of a shield volcano. its   peaceful thing and knows how to control its emotions.