subject
Business, 24.12.2021 07:40 liltay12386

On March 10, 2006, HDP Development, LLC purchased a 30-unit apartment property located in the vibrant neighborhood of North Hollywood (Los Angeles, California), for a total consideration of $4,525,045 or $150,834 per unit. The subject property was originally built in 1985 and consists of a three-story building totaling approximately 27,950 square feet of gross building area (GBA). The units range from 755 to 927 square feet rising over a ground floor parking garage providing 60 parking spaces. The property was purchased with the intent of converting into a for-sale condominium project which required an estimated $1,300,000 in hard costs, $300,000 in soft costs and $500,000 in carrying costs. The transaction was financed with a Note provided by First Commercial Bank of Hollywood, HDP was forecasting sale prices to average $330,000 per unit. As sales activity slowed dramatically, the loan interest reserve depleted and HDP ran out of money. The bank elected to restructure the loan rather than classify it as a non-performing asset on its balance sheet, in part to avoid regulatory oversight. On September 15, 2008, the Borrower and the Bank executed a loan modification which reset the unpaid principal balance, and called for the principal balance plus accruing interest to be paid by April 5, 2009. By April 5, 2009, no new sale closed and the loan matured. The bank elected to immediately file a Notice of Default and commenced the foreclosure process. Starting on the date of the NOD, the loan balance started accruing at the prescribed default rate. The bank short of liquidities due to the real estate downturn chose to market the note for sale. On April 30, 2009, PLIMSOL Real Estate Fund, LLC purchased the promissory note and obligations therewith. PLIMSOL, an experienced private equity fund focusing on the purchase and restructuring of non-performing real estate assets, immediately negotiated a forbearance agreement which essentially forced the Borrower to sell the units at reduced prices to payoff its loan obligation in lieu of foreclosure. The forbearance, which was executed on May 12, 2009, called for the foreclosure to be postponed as long as the Borrower sells a minimum of 2 units per month with minimum net proceeds of $185,000 per unit. A forbearance is not a loan modification, therefore the Borrower is still in default and interest accrues at the default rate.

HDP reduced its asking prices to an average of $235,000 per unit and sold off the units in the prescribed time frame. On November 15, 2009 HDP paid off its loan obligation in full at the sale of the 22nd unit. PLIMSOL successfully restructured the loan and the booked a pre-tax internal rate of return on its investment of 142%. The CFO of PLIMSOL tells you that $50,000 at closing of the loan purchase brought taxes current, which amount was added to the loan balance. Taxes then accrued unpaid until close of escrow at an average of $2,000 per unit per year. Other operating costs are covered 85% by the HOA fees, paid monthly at a rate of $250 per unit per month, paid the first of each month. Both taxes and HOA fees are prorated at closing. Sale commissions and closing costs averaged 6% of gross sale prices.

Requried:
Determine the actual purchase price of the promissory note and the return on equity is worthy of the position. Assume money for each sale is distributed back into the Fund at the close of each escrow.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 01:00
How does the economy of cuba differ from the economy of north korea? in north korea, the government’s control of the economy has begun to loosen. in cuba, the government maintains a tight hold over the economy. in cuba, the government’s control of the economy has begun to loosen. in north korea, the government maintains a tight hold over the economy. in north korea, there is economic uncertainty in exchange for individual choice. in cuba, there is economic security in exchange for government control. in cuba, there is economic uncertainty in exchange for individual choice. in north korea, there is economic security in exchange for government control.\
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 04:30
Jennifer purchased a house in a brand new development in the outskirts of town. when her house was built, the nearest fire department was nearly 20 miles away. as her neighborhood developed, the density of the community called for a new fire department 1.5 miles away. what effect will the new fire station have on her homeowners insurance premium? a. a new fire department will be more demanding on local taxes. her annual premium will go up. b. the location of a fire department has no bearing on the value of her house. her annual premium will stay the same. c. the new fire department will reduce the risk of financial loss in her home. her annual premium should decrease. d. with a fire department so close (less than 5 miles), financial risk on jennifer’s home practically disappears. she will not need to pay insurance anymore.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 18:00
Martha entered into a contract with terry, an art dealer. according to the contract, terry was to supply 18 th century artifacts to martha for the play she was directing, and martha was ready to pay $50,000 for this. another director needed the same artifacts and was ready to pay $60,000. terry decided not to sell the artifacts to martha. in this case, the court may order terry to:
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:00
Because this market is a monopolistically competitive market, you can tell that it is in long-run equilibrium by the fact thatmr=mc at the optimal quantity for each firm. furthermore, a monopolistically competitive firm's average total cost in long-run equilibrium isless than the minimum average total cost. true or false: this indicates that there is a markup on marginal cost in the market for engines. true false monopolistic competition may also be socially inefficient because there are too many or too few firms in the market. the presence of the externality implies that there is too little entry of new firms in the market.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
On March 10, 2006, HDP Development, LLC purchased a 30-unit apartment property located in the vibran...
Questions
question
Arts, 17.04.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 17.04.2021 14:00
question
Chemistry, 17.04.2021 14:00
question
Biology, 17.04.2021 14:00
question
Physics, 17.04.2021 14:00