A manufacturing company had been under pressure to increase profits, so it began to produce additional goods. The company was encouraged by the initial increases in revenue, even though profits per item produced were lower than average. Still, total profits increased, so the company decided to make another significant increase in production. This time, however, the profit per item had decreased so much that the company made almost no extra profit from the increase in production. This situation illustrates what concept? A. Law of diminishing returns B. Productivity analysis C. Cross-training D. Comparative advantage

Elizabeth believes her company has discriminated against her because her minority coworkers, who are less qualified, have been promoted ahead of her. which agency should elizabeth contact? - national alliance of business- affirmative action council- equal employment opportunity commission- federal trade commission- fair employment practices agency

Alandowner and his neighbor purchased adjoining undeveloped lots. after both built homes on their respective lots, the landowner suggested to the neighbor that a common driveway be built where the two lots joined. the neighbor agreed. the landowner and the neighbor split the cost of constructing the driveway and entered into a written agreement to equally share the costs of its upkeep and maintenance. the agreement was recorded in the county recorder's office. two years later, the neighbor built a new driveway located entirely on his lot. the common driveway, which the landowner continued to use but which the neighbor no longer used, began to deteriorate. the landowner asked the neighbor for money to maintain the common driveway, but the neighbor refused to contribute. three years later, the neighbor conveyed his lot to a friend. the friend entered into possession and used only the driveway built by the neighbor. by this time, the common driveway had deteriorated badly and contained numerous potholes. the landowner asked the friend to pay half of what it would take to repair the common driveway. the friend refused. the landowner repaired the driveway and sued the friend for 50% of the cost of repairs. will the landowner prevail?

Two assets have the following expected returns and standard deviations when the risk-free rate is 5%: asset a e(ra) = 18.5% σa = 20% asset b e(rb) = 15% σb = 27% an investor with a risk aversion of a = 3 would find that on a risk-return basis. a. only asset a is acceptable b. only asset b is acceptable c. neither asset a nor asset b is acceptable d. both asset a and asset b are acceptable