subject
Business, 25.11.2021 08:20 koboshy23

Kimberly has been helping Jonah in preparing his personal income tax forms for a couple of years. Jonah's boss recommended Kimberly because she had done a good job setting up the company's new accounting system. Jonah is very satisfied with Kimberly's work and feels that the fees she charges are quite reasonable. Kimberly would be classified as a(n)

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:10
The green fiddle has declared a $5 per share dividend. suppose capital gains are not taxed, but dividends are taxed at 15 percent. new irs regulations require that taxes be withheld at the time the dividend is paid. green fiddle stock sells for $71.50 per share, and the stock is about to go ex-dividend. what will the ex-dividend price be?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00
The purpose of the transportation approach for location analysis is to minimize which of the following? a. total costsb. total fixed costsc. the number of shipmentsd. total shipping costse. total variable costs
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 23:10
R& m chatelaine is one of the largest tax-preparation firms in the united states. it wants to acquire the tax experts, a smaller rival. after the merger, chatelaine will be one of the two largest income-tax preparers in the u.s. market. what should chatelaine include in its acquisition plans? it should refocus its attention from the national to the international market. in addition to acquiring the tax experts, it should also determine the best way to drive independent "mom and pop" tax preparers out of business. chatelaine will need to explain to the federal trade commission how the acquisition will not result in an increase in prices for consumers. chatelaine should enter a price-based competition with its other major competitor to force it out of business and become a monopoly.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Kimberly has been helping Jonah in preparing his personal income tax forms for a couple of years. Jo...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.10.2019 20:30
question
English, 18.10.2019 20:30