subject
Business, 26.10.2021 14:00 sighgabbie

Jim is the manager of an electronic store. Tom is an electronics distributor. On August 1, Jim calls Tom and orders 25 video game systems for $6,000. On August 5, Tom sends Jim an email confirming his order of 25 video game systems for $6,000. On August 20, Jim replies to Tom's email and Jim says he no longer wants the 25 video game systems. Tom ignores Jim's emails and ships the video game systems to Jim. Tom sues Jim for $6,000, who wins and why?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:40
The board of directors is the highest ranking body in a corporation, and the chairman of the board is the highest ranking individual. the ceo generally works under the board and its chairman, and the board generally has the authority to remove the ceo under certain conditions. the ceo, however, cannot remove the board, but he or she can endeavor to have the board voted out and a new board voted in should a conflict arise. it is possible for a person to simultaneously serve as ceo and chairman of the board, though many corporate control experts believe it is bad to vest both offices in the same person. true false
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 03:50
John is a 45-year-old manager who enjoys playing basketball in his spare time with his teenage sons and their friends. at work he finds that he is better able to solve problems that come up because of his many years of experience, but while on the court, he finds he is not as good keeping track of the ball while worrying about the other players. john's experience is:
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 16:20
Suppose you hold a portfolio consisting of a $10,000 investment in each of 8 different common stocks. the portfolio's beta is 1.25. now suppose you decided to sell one of your stocks that has a beta of 1.00 and to use the proceeds to buy a replacement stock with a beta of 1.55. what would the portfolio's new beta be? do not round your intermediate calculations.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 18:00
David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Jim is the manager of an electronic store. Tom is an electronics distributor. On August 1, Jim calls...
Questions
question
English, 16.10.2020 23:01
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 23:01
question
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 23:01