The owner of a personal watercraft put an ad for its sale in the paper. Her neighbor saw the ad and told her that he wanted to buy the watercraft but had to arrange for financing. The owner suggested that they write a contract for sale then and there so that they would not have to waste any time while he got his financing. They orally agreed that the contract would not become binding unless the neighbor obtained financing, but the written contract did not mention this and appeared to be a fully integrated document. The neighbor could not obtain financing and the owner brings suit to enforce the written contract. Who will prevail

D. The neighbor, because obtaining financing was a condition precedent.

Explanation:

Even though it wasn't listed in the written contract, there was the condition precedent that the contract would not be binding unless funding was obtained. Condition precedent is a condition that must happen for a contract to become enforceable.

Funding was not obtained so the contract cannot be enforced. The neighbor would therefore prevail so long as the owner admits that there was indeed a condition precedent.

x=3

step-by-step explanation:

this is really simple i saw that there was only one term (5x) and thought if that was 15 what would i have to multiply everything else to get it there? well if 5x became 15 then x would have to be 3 so plug the 3 in the x for the other equations and you get 15 for the other ones. so there you go. : )

answer; break-even analysis;