Book Values versus Market Values In preparing a balance sheet, why do you think standard accounting practice focuses on historical cost rather than market value

Historical costs is objectively and precisely measured, whereas market values can be difficult to estimate, and different analysts would come up with different

values.

Explanation:

In preparing a balance sheet it is customary for a company to value the assets and other items based on historical costs rather than market values.

For example if an asset is purchased at $20,000, this value will reflect in the balance sheet in subsequent years. Or future calculation will be based on this.

Let's say yearly depreciation is $1,000 then after on year the value will be $19,000, after two years $18,000 and so on.

This is more object than market value which varies at any one time.

Market value for an item will vary depending on location and the market.

answer: life insurence

explanation:

answer; ///i believe the best answer is (d) replace negative self talk with positive self-talk;