Assume that as a result of the coronavirus and U. S.​ (Federal) Government policies to ameliorate or lessen the​ virus’ public health​ impact, the U. S. unemployment increases from​ 3.6% to​ 13.7% by​ May, 2020. As part of monetary and fiscal​ policies, however, beginning in the summer of 2020 the Fed purchases over​ $3.5 Trillion in U. S. government bonds and Federal Government transfers​ $5,000 to every U. S. adult over 18 years old​ (not in​ college…. sorry) financed by government debt. ​ Then, as a part of its overall public health​ policies, the U. S. government begins to relax or loosen its previous travel and​ "shutter in" policies in the Spring 2021 so that people can now go to​ restaurants, movies or sporting events and the like more freely. Absent increases in the United States long run aggregate​ supply, the combined economic effects of such policies would most likely​ be: A. Lower interest rates. B. Higher unemployment rates consistent with the crowding out effect. C. Lower GDP growth. D. Higher rates of inflation.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.