Business, 07.05.2021 15:50 kitt90335

A law practice was incorporated on January 1, 2016, and expects to earn $25,000 per month before deducting the lawyer’s salary. The lawyer owns 100% of the stock. The corporation and the lawyer both use the cash method of accounting. The corporation does not need to retain any of the earnings in the business; thus, the salary of the lawyer (a calendar year taxpayer) will equal the corporation’s net income before salary expense. If the corporation could choose any tax year and pay the lawyer’s salary at the time that would be most tax efficient (but at least once every 12 months), what tax year should the corporation choose? When should the salary be paid each year?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 01:00

Awidower devised his fee simple interest in his residence as follows: “to my daughter for life, then to my oldest grandchild who survives her.” at the time of the widower’s death, he was survived by his only two children, a son and a daughter, and by one grandchild, his daughter’s son. a short time later, the daughter together with her son entered into a contract to sell the residence in fee simple to a buyer. the applicable jurisdiction continues to follow the common law rule against perpetuities, but has abrogated the rule in shelley’s case. at the closing, the buyer refused to purchase the residence. can the sellers compel the buyer to do so?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 18:00

If you would like to ask a question you will have to spend some points

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 00:00

Which of the following is not a factor to consider when deciding whether to accept a special order? whether this order will hurt the brand name of the company whether other potential orders would be more profitable whether additional fixed costs would need to be incurred whether the offered price is sufficient to cover prime costs and fixed overhead allocated all of the above

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 01:30

Bruce matthews played football for the tennessee titans. as part of his contract, he agreed to submit any dispute to arbitra- tion. he also agreed that tennessee law would determine all matters related to workers' compensation. after matthews retired, he filed a workers' compensation claim in california. the arbitrator ruled that matthews could pursue his claim in california but only under tennessee law. should this award be set aside?

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

A law practice was incorporated on January 1, 2016, and expects to earn $25,000 per month before ded...

Questions

Business, 26.08.2021 04:50

Which step is most important for a project to close? Select an Document the lessons learned. Close all contracts. The custo...