subject
Business, 30.04.2021 16:10 braxton24

With the advent of big data and increased computing power, some people have advocated for monetary policy by algorithm. Basically, real time data are fed into a program that then determines monetary policy decisions. What are some potential benefits of this approach? It would enable Fed policy to respond flexibly to unforeseen economic developments. It would prevent the Fed from engineering potentially inflationary short‑term economic booms. Changes to monetary policy would be perfectly predictable.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 18:10
Consumers who participate in the sharing economy seem willing to interact with total strangers. despite safety and privacy concerns, what do you think is the long-term outlook for this change in the way we think about interacting with people whom we don't know? how can businesses to diminish worries some people may have about these practices?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 23:40
Robert is a district manager who oversees several store managers in a national chain of restaurants. robert reports directly to the vice president of stores and marketing, a member of top management. robert is a middle manager.t/f
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 08:30
During his last performance review, franco's boss urged him to set some short-term and long-term sales goals to him perform better at work. which workplace skill does franco's boss want him to improve?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 17:30
Why is the cournot equilibrium an​ equilibrium? a. there are​ short-run barriers to exit in a cournot​ duopoly, so both firms cannot alter their output levels. b. given the other​ firm's level of​ production, both firms are maximizing profits and cannot improve their situation by unilaterally altering their level of output. c. both firms operate at zero profit under a cournot​ equilibrium, so they would face negative profits if they change output. d. both firms operate at minimum​ long-run average cost under a cournot​ equilibrium, so changes to output would reduce​ long-run profits. even if they​ can't collude, why​ don't firms set their outputs at the joint​ profit-maximizing levels​ (i.e., the levels they would have chosen had they​ colluded)? a. given that other firm produces at the collusive​ level, a firm could increase their own profits by increasing output above the collusive level. b. the midpoint of the collusion curve​ (i.e., the collusive​ outcome) lies below the reaction​ curves, so both firms have an incentive to increase output under the cournot duopoly. c. both a and b are correct d. both a and b are incorrect
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
With the advent of big data and increased computing power, some people have advocated for monetary p...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.05.2021 02:00
question
Mathematics, 11.05.2021 02:00