subject
Business, 12.04.2021 20:20 Coltong121

An investor has owned a property for five years. A property could be sold today for $2 million. It has a loan balance of $ 1 million and, if sold, the investor would incur a total of $250,000 in taxes (capital gains tax depreciation recapture tax). The investor has determined that if it were sold today, she would have earned an IRR of 15% on equity for the past five years. If not sold, the property is expected to produce after tax cash flow of $50,000 over the next two years. At the end of the two years, the property value is expected to increase to $2.1 million, the loan balance will decrease to $900,000. If sold after two years, the investor would incur a total of $255,000 in taxes. A. What is the incremental internal rate of return for keeping the property two additional years?
B. The investor has an outside investment opportunity that is expected to earn him a rate of return of 15%. What advice would you give the investor?
II. (Continuation of Question 1) The owner determines that if the property were renovated instead ofsold, after tax cash flow over the next two years would increase to $60,000 and the property could be sold after two years for $2.4 million. Renovation would cost $250,000. The investor would not borrow any additional funds to renovate the property. Assume that taxes due on sale after two years would be $255,000.
C. What is the rate of return the investor would earn on the additional funds invested in renovating the property (compared to not renovating the property and continuing to operate it as is)?
D. The investor has an outside investment opportunity that is expected to earn him a rate of return of 15%. Would you recommend the property be renovated?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30
Price and efficiency variances, journal entries. the schuyler corporation manufactures lamps. it has set up the following standards per finished unit for direct materials and direct manufacturing labor: direct materials: 10 lb. at $4.50 per lb. $45.00 direct manufacturing labor: 0.5 hour at $30 per hour 15.00 the number of finished units budgeted for january 2017 was 10,000; 9,850 units were actually produced. actual results in january 2017 were as follows: direct materials: 98,055 lb. used direct manufacturing labor: 4,900 hours $154,350 assume that there was no beginning inventory of either direct materials or finished units. during the month, materials purchased amounted to 100,000 lb., at a total cost of $465,000. input price variances are isolated upon purchase. input-efficiency variances are isolated at the time of usage. 1. compute the january 2017 price and efficiency variances of direct materials and direct manufacturing labor. 2. prepare journal entries to record the variances in requirement 1. 3. comment on the january 2017 price and efficiency variances of schuyler corporation. 4. why might schuyler calculate direct materials price variances and direct materials efficiency variances with reference to different points in time
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 15:30
Uknow what i love about i ask a dumb question it is immediately answered but when i ask a real question it take like an hour to get answered
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 18:50
)a business incurs the following costs per unit: labor $125/unit, materials $45/unit, and rent $250,000/month. if the firm produces 1,000,000 units a month, calculate the following: a. total variable costs b. total fixed costs c. total costs
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:30
The adjusted trial balance for china tea company at december 31, 2018, is presented below:
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
An investor has owned a property for five years. A property could be sold today for $2 million. It h...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 14:00
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 14:00
question
Chemistry, 16.12.2020 14:00
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 14:00
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 14:00