I have never had any credit card debt -- I was taught early on that I should never charge anything I didn't have the cash to pay for on the spot. I save a chunk of my paycheck every month in a savings account for emergencies, put 10% in my 401(k), and another 3.5% in a Roth IRA. My husband and I could afford a bigger apartment here in New York, two cars instead of one, and to eat out three or four times a week. But instead we live in a one bedroom, I ride a bike to get around, and we eat out once or twice a week. My husband brought a sizable credit card debt to our marriage, and living as we do has allowed us to aggressively pay it down -- it will be completely gone in the next 60 days -- without a late payment. I know it's a radical notion to live below one's means -- but it is how we've managed to maintain our lifestyle in this time which seems to be so challenging for so many. We are lucky in that we are both employed doing jobs we enjoy, and we have our health. But we've also made smart decisions about living within our means, and these decisions are paying dividends right now. And when the credit card debt is gone, we might even reward ourselves with our first ever vacation! Based on the above scenario, describe two things that the couple is doing right.

Can you post a video on of the question that you need on

Which of the following is an example of an unsought good? a. cameron purchases a new bike. b. jordan buys paper towels. c. taylor buys cupcakes from her favorite bakery. d. riley buys new windshield wipers for her car.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?