Business, 08.04.2021 18:50 que40

In 2020, Bertha Jarow had a $28,000 loss from the sale of a personal residence. She also purchased from an individual inventor for $7,000 (and resold in two months for $18,000) a patent on a rubber bonding process. The patent had not yet been reduced to practice. Bertha purchased the patent as an investment. In addition, she had the following capital gains and losses from stock transactions: Long-term capital loss ($6,000)
Long-term capital loss carryover from 2019 (12,000)
Short-term capital gain 21,000
Short-term capital loss (7,000)

Required:
What is Bertha's net capital gain or loss?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Bertha has a net long-term capital loss of $ 7,000. Bertha has a net short-term capital gain of $ 14,000 As a result, Bertha has an overall net short-term capital gain of $ 7,000.

Explanation:

Bertha Jarrow had a $28,000 loss from the sale of a personal residence. She also purchased from an individual inventor for $7,000 (and resold in two months for $18,000) a patent on a rubber bonding process. The patent had not yet been reduced to practice. Bertha purchased the patent as an investment. In addition, she had the following capital gains and losses from stock transactions: Long-term capital loss carryover from 2018 ($6,000) (12,000) 21,000 (7,000) Short-term capital gain Short-term capital loss a. What is Bertha's net capital gain or loss? Bertha has a net long-term capital loss of $ 7,000. Bertha has a net short-term capital gain of $ 14,000 As a result, Bertha has an overall net short-term capital gain of $ 7,000.

b. Complete the letter to Bertha, explaining the tax treatment of the sale of her personal residence. Assume Bertha's income from other sources puts her in the 24% bracket. Nellen, Young, Raabe, & Maloney, CPAs 5191 Natorp Boulevard Mason, OH 45040 March 17, 2020, Ms. Bertha Jarow 120 West Street Ashland, OR 97520 Dear Ms. Jarow: This letter is in response to your request for an explanation of the tax treatment of the sale of your residence. As you know, the residence was sold for less than your cost. Thus, you had a $ loss on the residence sale. Because the home was a personal use asset, tax law does not allow that loss to be deducted on your tax return. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Please telephone me if you have additional questions.

Answer from: Quest

it was decent, could have been a little better.. how bout you lol.

Answer from: Quest

How is this a question and how u need an answer for this

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 19:00

Ashare stock is a small piece of ownership in a company ture or false

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 21.06.2019 21:30

On july 1, 2016, killearn company acquired 103,000 of the outstanding shares of shaun company for $21 per share. this acquisition gave killearn a 40 percent ownership of shaun and allowed killearn to significantly influence the investee's decisions. as of july 1, 2016, the investee had assets with a book value of $6 million and liabilities of $1,468,500. at the time, shaun held equipment appraised at $140,000 above book value; it was considered to have a seven-year remaining life with no salvage value. shaun also held a copyright with a five-year remaining life on its books that was undervalued by $562,500. any remaining excess cost was attributable to goodwill. depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method. killearn applies the equity method for its investment in shaun. shaun's policy is to declare and pay a $1 per share cash dividend every april 1 and october 1. shaun's income, earned evenly throughout each year, was $580,000 in 2016, $606,600 in 2017, and $649,200 in 2018. in addition, killearn sold inventory costing $93,000 to shaun for $155,000 during 2017. shaun resold $97,500 of this inventory during 2017 and the remaining $57,500 during 2018.a. determine the equity income to be recognized by killearn during each of these years. 2016 2017 2018b. compute killearn’s investment in shaun company’s balance as of december 31, 2018.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 11:10

Robert black, regional manager for ford in texas and oklahoma, faced a dilemma. the ford f-150 pickup truck was the best-selling pickup ever, yet ford's headquarters in detroit had decided to introduce a completely redesigned f-150. how could mr. black sell both trucks at the same time? he still had "old" f-150s in stock. in his advertising, mr. black referred to the new f-150s as follows: "not a better f-150. just the only truck good enough to be the next f-150." this statement represents ford's of the new f-150.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 13:10

Paid-in-capital in excess of par represents the amount of proceeds a. from the original sale of common stock b. in excess of the par value from the original sale of common stock c. at the current market value of the common stock d. at the curent book value of the common stock

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

In 2020, Bertha Jarow had a $28,000 loss from the sale of a personal residence. She also purchased f...

Questions