A cash cow type of business Multiple Choice generates unusually high profits and returns on equity investment. is so profitable that it has no long-term debt. generates positive cash flows over and above its internal requirements, thus providing a corporate parent with cash flows that can be used for financing new acquisitions, investing in cash hog businesses, funding share buyback programs, and/or paying dividends. is a business with such a strong competitive advantage that it generates big profits, big returns on investment, and big cash surpluses after dividends are paid. has good strategic fit with a cash hog business.

generates positive cash flows over and above its internal requirements, thus providing a corporate parent with cash flows that can be used for financing new acquisitions, investing in cash hog businesses, funding share buyback programs, and/or paying dividends.

Explanation:

In Economics, a cash cow business produces large internal cash flows over and above what is needed to build and maintain the business. On the other hand, the internal cash flows of a cash hog business are too small to fully fund its operating needs and capital requirements.

Hence, a cash cow type of business generates positive cash flows over and above its internal requirements, thus providing a corporate parent with cash flows that can be used for financing new acquisitions, investing in cash hog businesses, funding share buyback programs, and/or paying dividends. Some examples of cash cow businesses are coca-cola, kellogg's corn flakes, Apple's iPhone, Microsoft Windows, Ford trucks, etc.

answer; i believe that the correct answer is client agreement;

the correct answer is economics is a game without winners or losers.

unlike sports or games economic is a game without losers or winner rather it is a game where everyone wins. parties of business doing businesses exchange money with each other and hence exchange is done on the basis of goods. one party takes the goods and other sales it so there is winner on both sides. each party values more highly the good it gets than the good it gives up. both sides exchange only because both intend to increase their value. so there is no concept of lose or win.