Agnes, a waitress at a local restaurant, suffers severe anxiety attacks when things get really busy at her job. As a result, she is a very ineffective waitress when the restaurant gets busy. For that reason , she is fired. Her employer could have assigned Agnes to shifts when the restaurant is not busy, but that would have significantly irritated the other waitresses, caused significant scheduling difficulties and cost some additional money. If Agnes sues the restaurant under the ADA, its best argument is:

that accommodating Agnes would cause the restaurant undue hardship.

Explanation:

From the question we are informed about Agnes, a waitress at a local restaurant, suffers severe anxiety attacks when things get really busy at her job. As a result, she is a very ineffective waitress when the restaurant gets busy. For that reason , she is fired. Her employer could have assigned Agnes to shifts when the restaurant is not busy, but that would have significantly irritated the other waitresses, caused significant scheduling difficulties and cost some additional money. If Agnes sues the restaurant under the ADA, its best argument is that accommodating Agnes would bring undue hardship to the restaurant. The Americans with Disabilities Act which is regarded as (ADA) is a law that protect disabilities in several areas against discrimination. These areas could be employment, public accommodations and others, but with the justification that Agnes would bring undue hardship to the restaurant, the restaurant is good to go.

answer///the madrid protocol;