subject
Business, 19.03.2021 17:10 jfw0504

Jayhawk Company reports current E&P of $450,000 and accumulated E&P of negative $297,500. Jayhawk distributed $500,000 to its sole shareholder, Christine Rock, on the last day of the year. Christine’s tax basis in her Jayhawk stock is $48,250 1. How much of the $500,000 distribution is treated as a dividend to Christine?
2. What is Christine’s tax basis in her Jayhawk stock after the distribution?
3. What is Jayhawk’s balance in accumulated E&P on the first day of next year?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 20:40
Which of the following actions is most likely to result in a decrease in the money supply? a. the discount rate on overnight loans is lowered. b. the government sells a new batch of treasury bonds. c. the federal reserve bank buys treasury bonds. d. the required reserve ratio for banks is decreased. 2b2t
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 05:20
Carmen co. can further process product j to produce product d. product j is currently selling for $20 per pound and costs $15.75 per pound to produce. product d would sell for $38 per pound and would require an additional cost of $8.55 per pound to produce. what is the differential revenue of producing product d?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:30
True or false: a fitted model with more predictors will necessarily have a lower training set error than a model with fewer predictors.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Jayhawk Company reports current E&P of $450,000 and accumulated E&P of negative $297,500. Ja...
Questions