Business, 25.02.2021 02:20 desikayla2013

Hoi ───▄▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▄───COPY PASTE ME AND FIGHT BOB!!!
───█▒▒░░░░░░░░░▒▒█───I am TACO I AM THE NEW WAY
────█░░█░░░░░█░░█────Join my kingdom:
─▄▄──█░░░▀█▀░░░█──▄▄─https://pad let. com/tristajm32/meow
█░░█─▀▄░░░░░░░▄▀─█░░█───█▒▒░░░░░░░░ ░▒▒█───I am TACO I AM

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 19:10

King fisher aviation is evaluating an investment project with the following case flows: $6,000 $5,500 $7,000 $8,000 discount rate 14 percent what is the discounted payback period for these cash flows if the initial cost is 15,000? what if the initial cost is $12,000? what if the cost is $16,000?

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 21.06.2019 23:00

Which of the following statements about the relationship between economic costs and accounting costs is true? multiple choice accounting costs are equal to or greater than economic costs. accounting costs must always equal economic costs. accounting costs are always greater than economic costs. accounting costs are always less than or equal to economic costs.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 15:00

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 16:00

Which of the following statements is correct? a. the managers of established, stable companies sometimes attempt to get their state legislatures to remove rules that make it more difficult for raiders to succeed with hostile takeovers. b. hostile takeovers are most likely to occur when a firm's stock is selling below its intrinsic value as a result of poor management. c. stockholders in general would be better off if managers never disclosed favorable events and therefore caused the price of the firm's stock to sell at a price below its intrinsic value. d. the efficiency of the u.s. economy would probably be increased if hostile takeovers were absolutely forbidden. e. in general, it is more in bondholders' interests than stockholders' interests for a firm to shift its investment focus away from safe, stable investments and into risky investments, especially those that primarily involve research and development. icon key question 6 of 10 b multiple choice 01-060

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Hoi ───▄▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▄───COPY PASTE ME AND FIGHT BOB!!!
───█▒▒░░░░░░░░░▒▒█───I am TACO I AM T...

Questions