Question 1 of 10
How do employers benefit from defining sexual harassment in the employee
h...
Question 1 of 10
How do employers benefit from defining sexual harassment in the employee
handbook and telling employees how to avoid and report it?
A. It guarantees compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health
Act.
B. It helps them obey anti-discrimination laws and ensure all
employees feel welcome on the job.
C. It ensures that the company doesn't engage in any unfair labor
practices.
D. It ensures that all the company's employees are eligible to work in
the United States.
SUBMIT
Answers: 2
Business, 22.06.2019 22:30
Upper a report about the decline of western investment in third world countries included this: "after years of daily flights comma several european airlines halted passenger service. foreign investment fell 400 percent during the 1990 s." what is wrong with this statement? choose the correct answer below. a. if foreign investment fell by 100 % comma it would be totally eliminated comma so it is not possible for it to fall by more than 100 %. b. the actual amount of the decrease in foreign investment is less than 100%. c. if foreign investment fell by 100%, it would be cut in half. thus, a decrease of 200% means that it would be totally eliminated, and a decrease of more than 200% is impossible. d. the statement does not mention the initial amount of foreign investment.
Answers: 3
Business, 23.06.2019 02:30
Congressman patrick indicates that he is opposed to tax proposals that call for a flat tax rate because the structure would not tax those individuals who have the ability to pay the tax. discuss the position of the congressman, giving consideration to tax rate structures (e.g., progressive, proportional, and regressive) and the concept of equity.
Answers: 3
Business, 23.06.2019 11:00
How do you write a business plan ? i will give you a brainliest.
Answers: 1
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
English, 15.04.2021 03:10
Social Studies, 15.04.2021 03:10
Mathematics, 15.04.2021 03:10
Social Studies, 15.04.2021 03:10
History, 15.04.2021 03:10
Physics, 15.04.2021 03:10
English, 15.04.2021 03:10
Mathematics, 15.04.2021 03:10
Mathematics, 15.04.2021 03:10
Chemistry, 15.04.2021 03:10
Mathematics, 15.04.2021 03:10