subject
Business, 31.12.2020 19:20 marlenerojas201

The Jones are a married couple and have always filed joint tax returns. On May 18, 2017, the couple was assessed with tax deficiencies for the 2015 tax year. The assessment relates to income paid to Mr. Jones which was not reported on the joint return. The couple’s accountant prepared the return. The couple reported $50,000 income for 2015. The amount of the income omitted was $200,000. Mrs. Jones is a homemaker. She admits that based on their lifestyle she thought the couple's income was approximately $100,000 ($50,000 more than reported). However she had limited access to her husband's financial documents and relied on the accountant. She claims she had no knowledge of the extent of the unreported income and assumed much of their income was non- taxable in nature. You should advise her that she:

a. Under no circumstances will she be responsible for any of the taxes due because an accountant prepared the return.
b. May be able to avoid liability to the extent she had no actual knowledge of the deficiency when filing the return. The burden of proof will be on the IRS.
c. May be able to avoid liability to the extent she had no reason to know of the deficiency (and did not have actual knowledge) when filing the return. The burden of proof will be on her.
d. None of the above.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 01:20
Cindy recently played in a softball game in which she misplayed a ground ball for an error. later, in the same game, she made a great catch on a very difficult play. according to the self-serving bias, she would attribute her error to and her good catch to her
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:10
Profits from using currency options and futures.on july 2, the two-month futures rate of the mexican peso contained a 2 percent discount (unannualized). there was a call option on pesos with an exercise price that was equal to the spot rate. there was also a put option on pesos with an exercise price equal to the spot rate. the premium on each of these options was 3 percent of the spot rate at that time. on september 2, the option expired. go to the oanda.com website (or any site that has foreign exchange rate quotations) and determine the direct quote of the mexican peso. you exercised the option on this date if it was feasible to do so. a. what was your net profit per unit if you had purchased the call option? b. what was your net profit per unit if you had purchased the put option? c. what was your net profit per unit if you had purchased a futures contract on july 2 that had a settlement date of september 2? d. what was your net profit per unit if you sold a futures contract on july 2 that had a settlement date of september 2
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:00
If an investment has 35 percent more nondiversifiable risk than the market portfolio, its beta will be:
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 23:50
Juniper company, inc. uses a perpetual inventory system. the company purchased $9,750 of merchandise on august 7 with terms 1/10, n/30. on august 11, it returned $1,500 worth of merchandise. on august 16, it paid the full amount due. the correct journal entry to record the payment on august 16 is:
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The Jones are a married couple and have always filed joint tax returns. On May 18, 2017, the couple...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 31.08.2021 01:10
question
Mathematics, 31.08.2021 01:10
question
Chemistry, 31.08.2021 01:10
question
Health, 31.08.2021 01:10