Scenario #2: Pamela Pamela is also a saver. She sets aside $100 per month during her 40 year career. She invests in the US stock market
through an index fund that averages a 7% return over this 40 year period.
5.
What is the total balance in
the account after 40 years?
6. How much of the total did
Pamela contribute herself?
7. How much money did Pamela
make through compounded
returns in this investment
account?
8. Why is Pamela's total balance so much greater than Raul's even though she contributed the same amount as
he did?

Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.