subject
Business, 28.08.2020 19:01 lilay30

Which one of the following is false as concerns the merits of why being public spirited and devoting time and resources to social responsibility initiatives, environmental sustainability, and good corporate citizenship is "good business?" A. The higher the public profile of a company or its brand, the greater the scrutiny of its activities and the higher the potential for it to become a target for pressure group action.
B. Some employees feel better about working for a company committed to improving society--a condition that can contribute to lower turnover and better worker productivity.
C. A strong visible social responsibility strategy gives a company an edge in differentiating itself from rivals and in appealing to those consumers who prefer to do business with companies that are good corporate citizens.
D. Acting in a socially responsible manner nearly always results in higher profits because the accompanying favorable publicity produces gains in revenues that are more than sufficient to cover the costs of its social responsibility strategy.
E. Companies with deservedly good reputations for contributing time and money to the betterment of society are better able to attract and retain employees compared to companies with tarnished reputations.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:10
Suppose that the firm cherryblossom has an orchard they are willing to sell today. the net annual returns to the orchard are expected to be $50,000 per year for the next 20 years. at the end of 20 years, it is expected the land will sell for $30,000. calculate the market value of the orchard if the market rate of return on comparable investments is 16%.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00
Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 23:30
Each state’s organizational structure is guided by the federal government.true or false?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 01:30
Lee earns $1,482 of interest in 270 days after making a deposit of $15,200. find the interest rate.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which one of the following is false as concerns the merits of why being public spirited and devoting...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 17.12.2021 04:20