Milner Developers proposed an offer to Henry Wright, an independent contractor, offering to hire him for their next project. They offered him a certain rate and specified the contract details along with describing the stipulated mode of acceptance but received no response. Wright responded to the offer after a delay of two months with a quote for a higher amount than that mentioned by Milner Developers. Do the two parties have a binding contract? A) No, because the offer made by Milner Developers was ambiguous.
B) No, because Wright's letter was a counteroffer to the original offer.
C) Yes, because Milner Developers did receive a response from Wright.
D) Yes, because Wright's silent signaled his acceptance of the offer.

b. No, because Wright's letter was a counteroffer to the original offer.

Explanation:

Contract is issued based on a binding agreement between two parties, the employer and the employee. The employer gives the terms and conditions which embeds the allowances, while the employee receives the letter and is either expected to give a response there or after a specific period of time, the letter cannot be changed by the employee after delay but there could be negotion within the time frame given. Wright had to offence to be blamed for; 1) he delayed the response. 2) Requesting a higher amount after a long while.

answer; property tax payment made in july and december;

answer; the landlord can sue the renter,and the renter loses the security deposit;