Perry Investments bought 2,000 shares of Able, Inc. common stock on January 1, 2017, for $20,000 and 2,000 shares of Baker, Inc. common stock on July 1, 2017 for $24,000. Baker paid $2,400 of previously declared dividends to Perry on December 31, 2017. At the end of 2017, the fair value of the Able stock was $18,000 and the fair value of the Baker stock was $28,000. The stocks were purchased for short-term speculation prior to the effective date of the change in accounting rules for equity investments. Perry owns 10% of each company. Perry should record the receipt of the Baker dividend as:. A. DR Cash 2,400 CR Investment in Baker 2,400.
B. DR Cash 240 CR Dividend income 240.
C. DR Cash 2,400 CR Dividends receivable 2,400.
D. DR Dividends receivable 2,400 CR Dividend income 2,400.

2. explain two ways that an informational interview is different from a job interview 3. describe two ways that an informational interview would be a benefit to you. 4. write two questions that you would ask in an informational interview. answer all in complete sentences for brainliest!

How can a poor housing market put home buyers in a financially unstable position? a. changing property values means it’s easier to find homes with low rental costs. b. when the home value decreases, property taxes and insurance costs increase. c. houses are valued lower than their purchase prices, so the home equity decreases. d. home buyers lose all tax benefits and tax incentives when the housing market goes down. e. mortgage payments can increase even though the home value decreases.

Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.