In 2017​, actual manufacturing overhead is $ 307 comma 800. CP's simple costing system allocates manufacturing overhead to its three customers based on​ machine-hours and prices its contracts based on full costs. One of its customers has regularly complained of being charged noncompetitive​ prices, so CP's controller Declan Johnson realizes that it is time to examine the consumption of overhead resources more closely. He knows that there are three main departments that consume overhead​ resources: design,​ production, and engineering. Interviews with the department personnel and examination of time records yield the following detailed​ information:Raw A Department: design, production, engineering, total. Raw B Cost driver: CAD-design-hours, engineering-hours, machine-hours. Raw C Manufacturing overhead in 2014: $39,000/ 29,600/240,000 total $308,600 then usage of cost drivers by customer contract Raw D: united motors 110/70/120 Raw E: Holden motors 200/20/2,800 Raw F Leland auto 80/240/1080 then 1. compute the manufacturing overhead allocated to each customer in 2017 using the simple costing system that uses machine-hours a the allocation base. 2. Compute the manufacturing overhead allocated to each customer in 2017 using department-base manufacturing overhead rates. 3. Comment on your answer in requirements 1 and 2. Which customer do you think was complaining about being overcharged in the simple system? If the new department based rates are used to price contracts, which customer(s) will be unhappy? how would you respond to these concerns? 4. How else might AP use the information available from its department-by-department analysis of manufacturing overhead costs?5. AP's managers are wondering if they should further refine the department-by-department costing system into and ABC system by identifying different activities within each department. Under what conditions would it not be worthwhile to further the department costing system into an ABC system?