subject
Business, 18.06.2020 21:57 jeffreyaxtell4132

During 2009, Accent Toys Plc., which began business in October of that year, purchased 15,000 units of a toy at cost of $10 per unit in October. The toy sold well in October. In anticipation of heavy December sales, Accept purchased 7,000 additional units in November at a cost of $11 per unit. During 2009, Accent sold 18,000 units at a price of $15 per unit. Under the first in, first out (FIFO) method, what is Accent's cost of goods sold for 2009?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 20:30
Max fischer is a beekeeper. his annual group insurance costs 11,700. his employer pays 60% of the cost. how much does max pay semimonthly for it?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 15:20
On january 2, 2018, bering co. disposes of a machine costing $34,100 with accumulated depreciation of $18,369. prepare the entries to record the disposal under each of the following separate assumptions. exercise 8-24a part 2 2. the machine is traded in for a newer machine having a $50,600 cash price. a $16,238 trade-in allowance is received, and the balance is paid in cash. assume the asset exchange has commercial substance.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 13:30
Which tasks do travel agents and hotel concierges have in common? they both recommend where to eat and handle personal services for tourists. they both process payments and book travel packages for tourists. they both make reservations and provide information for tourists. they both recommend unusual spots to visit and book tour guides for tourists
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
During 2009, Accent Toys Plc., which began business in October of that year, purchased 15,000 units...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 20.08.2021 06:20
question
Social Studies, 20.08.2021 06:30