subject
Business, 18.06.2020 04:57 2kdragginppl

Winners and losers from tariff reductions Suppose that Canada imports pearl necklaces from India. The free market price is $80.00 per necklace. If the tariff on imports in Canada is initially 8%, Canadians pay $ per necklace. One of the accomplishments of the Uruguay Round that took place between 1986 and 1993 was significant across-the-board tariff cuts for industrial countries, as well as many developing countries. Suppose that as a result of the Uruguay Round, Canada reduces its import tariffs to 4%. Assuming the price of pearl necklaces is still $ per necklace, consumers now pay the price of per necklace. in Canada and Based on the calculations and the scenarios presented, the Uruguay Round most likely in India

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:10
Laws corporation is considering the purchase of a machine costing $16,000. estimated cash savings from using the new machine are $4,120 per year. the machine will have no salvage value at the end of its useful life of six years and the required rate of return for laws corporation is 12%. the machine's internal rate of return is closest to (ignore income taxes) (a) 12% (b) 14% (c) 16% (d) 18%
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:50
Two products, qi and vh, emerge from a joint process. product qi has been allocated $34,300 of the total joint costs of $55,000. a total of 2,900 units of product qi are produced from the joint process. product qi can be sold at the split-off point for $11 per unit, or it can be processed further for an additional total cost of $10,900 and then sold for $13 per unit. if product qi is processed further and sold, what would be the financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company compared with sale in its unprocessed form directly after the split-off point?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 13:30
Jose recently died with a probate estate of $900,000. he was predeceased by his wife, guadalupe, and his daughter, lucy. he has two surviving children, pete and fred. jose was also survived by eight grandchildren, pete’s three children, naomi, daniel, nick; fred’s three children, heather, chris and steve; and lucy’s two children, david and rachel. jose’s will states the following “i leave everything to my three children. if any of my children shall predecease me then i leave their share to their heirs, per stirpes.” which of the following statements is correct? (a) under jose’s will rachel will receive $150,000. (b) under jose’s will chris will receive $150,000. (c) under jose’s will nick will receive $100,000. (d) under jose’s will pete will receive $200,000.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 14:30
Your own record of all your transactions. a. check register b. account statement
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Winners and losers from tariff reductions Suppose that Canada imports pearl necklaces from India. Th...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.11.2019 12:31