Three friends Arun, Tarun and Varun are engaged in different types of activities to earn their
livelihood. Arun describes his occupation by saying that, "transfer of interest is not possible in
case of my occupation and at the same time it does not require any capital investment.” Tarun
remarks, “in my occupation also transfer of interest is not possible but one needs to possess
high degree of specialized knowledge in a particular field." Varun shares that in his occupation
transfer of interest is possible with some formalities and also capital investment is essential
(a) Identify the different types of economic activities being described in the above
paragraph.
(b) Give any three points of difference between them which have not been mentioned in
the given paragraph.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.