subject
Business, 06.05.2020 02:28 lacyfigueroa

Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a) The component cost of preferred stock is expressed as rp(1 - T). This follows because preferred stock dividends are treated as fixed charges, and as such they can be deducted by the issuer for tax purposes.
b) Suppose a firm has been losing money and thus is not paying taxes, and this situation is expected to persist into the foreseeable future. In this case, the firm’s before-tax and after-tax costs of debt for purposes of calculating the WACC will both be equal to the interest rate on the firm’s currently outstanding debt, provided that debt was issued during the past 5 years.
c) A cost should be assigned to retained earnings due to the opportunity cost principle, which refers to the fact that the firm’s stockholders would themselves expect to earn a return on earnings that were paid out rather than retained and reinvested.
d) If a firm has enough retained earnings to fund its capital budget for the coming year, then there is no need to estimate either a cost of equity or a WACC.
e) No cost should be assigned to retained earnings because the firm does not have to pay anything to raise them. They are generated as cash flows by operating assets that were raised in the past, hence they are "free."

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 03:00
If you were running a company, what are at least two things you could do to improve its productivity.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 08:30
Match each item to check for while reconciling a bank account with the document to which it relates.(there's not just one answer)1. balancing account statement2. balancing check registera. nsf feesb. deposits in transitc. interest earnedd. bank errors
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 17:30
Alinguist had a gross income of 53,350 last year. if 17.9% of his income got witheld for federal income tax, how much of the linguist's pay got witheld for federal income tax last year?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00
Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a) The component cost of preferred stock is expr...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.11.2020 16:00
question
Mathematics, 12.11.2020 16:00
question
Physics, 12.11.2020 16:00
question
Chemistry, 12.11.2020 16:00
question
Mathematics, 12.11.2020 16:10